A comparative study of Geometry in first-grade Mathematics textbooks from four countries
Abstract
This study presents a comparative analysis of the treatment of geometry in first-grade mathematics textbooks from Greece, Cyprus, Austria and Singapore, countries with different levels of achievement in the PISA mathematics assessment. Data were collected through qualitative content analysis, focusing on the extent, sequencing and instructional aims of geometric content, as well as the nature of the proposed activities. The findings reveal differences in curricular priorities, with Greece and Cyprus placing greater emphasis on geometric content coverage, while Austria and Singapore prioritize problem-solving processes and the development of critical thinking skills.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Atiyah, M. (2001). Mathematics in the 20th century. American Mathematical Monthly, 108(7), 654-666.
Bryman, A. (2017). Μέθοδοι κοινωνικής έρευνας. (μτφ. Π. Σακελλαρίου). Αθήνα: Gutenberg. [in Greek].
Charalambous, C. Y., Delaney, S., Hsu, H. Y., & Mesa, V. (2010). A comparative analysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in textbooks from three countries. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 117-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903460070.
Deliyianni, E., Gagatsis, A., Elia, I., & Panaoura, A. (2016). Representational flexibility and problem-solving ability in fraction and decimal number addition: A structural model. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(2), 397-417. doi: 10.1007/s10763-015-9625-6
Dreher, A., & Kuntze, S. (2015). Teachers ’ professional knowledge and noticing: The case of multiple representations in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(1), 89-114. doi:10.1007/s10649-014-9577-8.
Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 45(5), 633-646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x.
Gridos, P., Gagatsis, A., Elia, I., & Deliyianni, E., (2019). Mathematical creativity and geometry: The influence of geometrical figure apprehension on the production of multiple solutions. Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education: Working Group 4. Utrecht, Netherlands.
Gridos, P., Avgerinos, E., Mamona-Downs, J. & Vlachou, R. (2021). Geometrical figure apprehension, construction of auxiliary lines, and multiple solutions in problem solving: Aspects of mathematical creativity in school Geometry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(3), 619-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10155-4.
Gridos, P., Avgerinos, E., Deliyianni, E., Elia, I., Gagatsis, A., & Geitona, Z. (2021). Unpacking The relation between spatial ability and creativity in Geometry. The European Educational Researcher, 4(3), 307-328. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.433.
Herbst, P. (2002). Establishing a custom of proving in American school geometry: evolution of the two-column proof in the early twentieth century. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(3), 283-312.
Jiang, C., & Chua, B. L. (2010). Strategies for solving three fraction-related word problems on speed: a Comparative study between Chinese and Singaporean students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 73-96.doi: 10.1007/s10763-009-9163-1.
Julie, C. (2013). The stability of learners' choices for real-life situations to be used in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(2), pp. 196-203.
Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., Steiger, J. H. (2013). Creativity and technical innovation: Spatial ability’s unique role. Psychological Science, 24, 1831–1836.
Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2012). The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. Journal of Mathematics Behavior, 31, 73-90.
NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
OECD (2013). PISA 2012: Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing.
OECD (2014). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014), PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en.
PISA. (2016). Problem solving for tomorrow’s world. OECD Publishing.
Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Valverde, G. A., Houang, R. T., & Wiley, D. E. (2001). Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning. The Jossey Bass Education Series.
Shahbari, A. J., & Peled, I. (2015). Resolving cognitive conflict in a realistic situation with modeling characteristics: Coping with a changing reference in fractions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(4), 891-907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9509-1.
Singer, F. M., Voica, C., & Pelczer, I. (2017). Cognitive styles in posing geometry problems: implications for assessment of mathematical creativity. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 37-52.
Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Springer Science Business Media LLC.
Van De Walle, J. A. (2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics (6th ed). New York: Longman.
Wang, T. L., & Yang, D. C. (2016). A Comparative study of geometry in elementary school mathematics textbooks from five countries. European Journal of STEM Education, 1(3), 58. https://doi.org/10.20897/lectito.201658.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26220/mje.5545
View Counter: Abstract | 0 | times, and PDF | 0 | times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Mediterranean Journal of Education | ISSN: 2732-6489 | Department of Educational Sciences and Early Childhood Education - University of Patras.
Pasithee | Library & Information Center | University of Patras